• Sl chevron_right

      Contact publication

      pubsub.blastersklan.com / slashdot · 2 days ago - 23:28 edit

    Creating a sexually explicit "deepfake" image is to be made an offence under a new law in the UK, the Ministry of Justice has announced. The Guardian: Under the legislation, anyone who creates such an image without consent will face a criminal record and an unlimited fine. They could also face jail if the image is shared more widely. The creation of a deepfake image will be an offence regardless of whether the creator intended to share it, the department said. The Online Safety Act, introduced last year, has already criminalised the sharing of deepfake intimate images, whose creation is being facilitated by advances in artificial intelligence. The offence will be introduced through an amendment to the criminal justice bill, which is making its way through parliament. Laura Farris, the minister for victims and safeguarding, said the creation of deepfake sexual images was "unacceptable irrespective of whether the image is shared."

    Read more of this story at Slashdot.

    Creating Sexually Explicit Deepfake Images To Be Made Offense in UK
    • wifi_tethering open_in_new

      This post is public

      news.slashdot.org /story/24/04/16/202200/creating-sexually-explicit-deepfake-images-to-be-made-offense-in-uk

    • chevron_right

      UK targets “despicable individuals” who create AI sex deepfakes with new law

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · 2 days ago - 14:51 · 1 minute

    An illustrator's concept of a deepfake.

    Enlarge (credit: Getty Images )

    On Tuesday, the UK government announced a new law targeting the creation of AI-generated sexually explicit deepfake images. Under the legislation, which has not yet been passed, offenders would face prosecution and an unlimited fine, even if they do not widely share the images but create them with the intent to distress the victim. The government positions the law as part of a broader effort to enhance legal protections for women.

    Over the past decade, the rise of deep learning image synthesis technology has made it increasingly easy for people with a consumer PC to create misleading pornography by swapping out the faces of the performers with someone else who has not consented to the act. That practice spawned the term "deepfake" around 2017, named after a Reddit user named "deepfakes" that shared AI-faked porn on the service. Since then, the term has grown to encompass completely new images and video synthesized entirely from scratch, created from neural networks that have been trained on images of the victim.

    The problem isn't unique to the UK. In March, deepfake nudes of female middle school classmates in Florida led to charges against two boys ages 13 and 14. The rise of open source image synthesis models like Stable Diffusion since 2022 has increased the urgency among regulators in the US to attempt to contain (or at least punish) the act of creating non-consensual deepfakes. The UK government is on a similar mission.

    Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Google Delisted Thousands of ‘Music Piracy’ Domains in Response to UK Blocking Orders

      news.movim.eu / TorrentFreak · 6 days ago - 10:50 · 3 minutes

    dmca-google-s1 For a long time, pirate site blocking was regarded as a topic most U.S. politicians would rather avoid.

    This remnant of the SOPA defeat drove copyright holders to focus on blocking efforts in other countries instead.

    Those challenging times are now more than a decade old, and momentum is shifting. After more than forty countries around the world instituted site-blocking measures, U.S. lawmakers may be more receptive to revisiting the topic.

    This week, MPA Chairman and CEO Charles Rivkin announced that the movie industry group is going to work with Members of Congress to enact judicial site-blocking legislation in the United States. The RIAA will likely join this effort, as music industry groups have joined similar blocking efforts in other countries too.

    The site-blocking quest is undoubtedly going to fill plenty of headlines in the U.S. media, as it remains a hot topic. That’s quite a contrast to what we see in other countries, including the UK, where similar measures have been in place for many years.

    UK Site Blocking Lull

    Following requests from movie studios, record labels, publishers, sports leagues and broadcasters, hundreds of websites are blocked in the UK today. This translates to many thousands of domain names, as proxy sites and backup domains are also included. The precise number of websites and associated domains, including their variants and IP addresses, is difficult to report accurately due to a lack of official documentation; certainly, the shifting nature of dynamic blocking doesn’t make reporting any easier.

    The UK mainstream press hasn’t shown much interest in the topic in recent years. When the MPA obtained the first-ever blocking order against a cyberlocker two years ago, the BBC didn’t even mention it .

    Meanwhile, UK blocking efforts have expanded considerably, not just by numbers, but also in scope. Without any public announcement, search engine Google joined the effort and since 2022, the company has voluntarily removed domain names from UK search results if these are covered by existing ISP blocking orders.

    We uncovered these Google delistings by accident and the involved parties subsequently confirmed this blocking expansion. However, Google itself remained quiet for a long time, perhaps due to its previous anti-blocking stance .

    17,317 Flagged URLs

    Google’s delisting of pirate sites in the UK remains ongoing today. There are no official announcements on this front, but the search engine’s transparency reports published by Lumen provide some insight into this activity.

    For example, we can see that music industry group BPI reported 1,470 pirate site URLs to Google this month, asking the company to delist them entirely. The BPI added the relevant court orders to all requests and Google complied by removing most domains from its UK search results.

    Looking further back, we can see that BPI has asked Google to delist 17,317 URLs from its search engine over the past two years. These requests are separate from regular takedown notices, as the full domains are completely removed from search results.

    Inflated Numbers

    The 17,317 figure is significant but requires nuance. It includes various proxy subdomains as well as subdomains of stream-ripping services. The latter are used to actively evade Google removals and site-blocking itself.

    proxies

    In addition, the BPI has a habit of occasionally double-listing domain names in their requests, or submitting identical domain names in multiple requests. This further inflates the totals.

    Caveats aside, it’s probably safe to say that thousands of domain names have been delisted by Google in response to site-blocking orders. These domains provide, or at least used to provide, access to hundreds of pirate sites. This includes The Pirate Bay and many of its proxies, which have been completely stripped from Google’s top results in the UK.

    Needless to say; if site-blocking legislation eventually makes its way to the United States, we can expect to see similar efforts there. However, we don’t think that will happen so quietly.

    From: TF , for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

    • chevron_right

      US, UK ink AI pact modeled on intel sharing agreements

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Tuesday, 2 April - 13:42

    outline of faces behind numbers

    Enlarge (credit: LagartoFilm/Dreamstime)

    The US and UK have signed a landmark agreement on artificial intelligence, as the allies become the first countries to formally cooperate on how to test and assess risks from emerging AI models.

    The agreement, signed on Monday in Washington by UK science minister Michelle Donelan and US commerce secretary Gina Raimondo, lays out how the two governments will pool technical knowledge, information and talent on AI safety.

    The deal represents the first bilateral arrangement on AI safety in the world and comes as governments push for greater regulation of the existential risks from new technology, such as its use in damaging cyber attacks or designing bioweapons.

    Read 16 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      World’s first global AI resolution unanimously adopted by United Nations

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Thursday, 21 March - 20:11 · 1 minute

    The United Nations building in New York.

    Enlarge / The United Nations building in New York. (credit: Getty Images )

    On Thursday, the United Nations General Assembly unanimously consented to adopt what some call the first global resolution on AI, reports Reuters . The resolution aims to foster the protection of personal data, enhance privacy policies, ensure close monitoring of AI for potential risks, and uphold human rights. It emerged from a proposal by the United States and received backing from China and 121 other countries.

    Being a nonbinding agreement and thus effectively toothless, the resolution seems broadly popular in the AI industry. On X, Microsoft Vice Chair and President Brad Smith wrote , "We fully support the @UN's adoption of the comprehensive AI resolution. The consensus reached today marks a critical step towards establishing international guardrails for the ethical and sustainable development of AI, ensuring this technology serves the needs of everyone."

    The resolution, titled " Seizing the opportunities of safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems for sustainable development ," resulted from three months of negotiation, and the stakeholders involved seem pleased at the level of international cooperation. "We're sailing in choppy waters with the fast-changing technology, which means that it's more important than ever to steer by the light of our values," one senior US administration official told Reuters, highlighting the significance of this "first-ever truly global consensus document on AI."

    Read 5 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • Sl chevron_right

      Contact publication

      pubsub.blastersklan.com / slashdot · Tuesday, 19 March - 18:48 edit

    A man has been sentenced for cyber flashing in England for the first time. From a report: Nicholas Hawkes, 39, from Basildon in Essex, was jailed for 66 weeks at Southend Crown Court today after he sent unsolicited photos of his erect penis to a 15-year-old girl and a woman on 9 February. The older victim took screenshots of the offending image on WhatsApp and reported Hawkes to the police the same day. Cyber flashing became a criminal offence in England with the passage of the Online Safety Act on 31 January. It has been a crime in Scotland since 2010. The offence covers the sending of an unsolicited sexual image to people via social media, dating apps, text message or data-sharing services such as Bluetooth and AirDrop. Victims of cyber flashing get lifelong anonymity from the time they report the offence, as it also falls under the Sexual Offences Act.

    Read more of this story at Slashdot.

    Nicholas Hawkes, 39, Becomes First in England To Be Jailed for Cyber Flashing
    • wifi_tethering open_in_new

      This post is public

      news.slashdot.org /story/24/03/19/1838200/nicholas-hawkes-39-becomes-first-in-england-to-be-jailed-for-cyber-flashing

    • chevron_right

      Contact publication

      feed.xmpp.earth / RPi_Locator · Monday, 26 February - 15:54 edit

    Stock Alert (UK): Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is In Stock at The Pi Hut

    Stock Alert (UK): Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is In Stock at The Pi Hut
    • chevron_right

      Contact publication

      feed.xmpp.earth / RPi_Locator · Monday, 26 February - 14:24 edit

    Stock Alert (UK): Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is In Stock at The Pi Hut

    Stock Alert (UK): Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is In Stock at The Pi Hut
    • chevron_right

      Contact publication

      feed.xmpp.earth / RPi_Locator · Monday, 26 February - 12:34 edit

    Stock Alert (UK): Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is In Stock at The Pi Hut

    Stock Alert (UK): Raspberry Pi Zero 2 W is In Stock at The Pi Hut