• chevron_right

      Google can’t quit third-party cookies—delays shut down for a third time

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · Yesterday - 17:30 · 1 minute

    Extreme close-up photograph of finger above Chrome icon on smartphone.

    Enlarge (credit: Getty Images )

    Will Chrome, the world's most popular browser, ever kill third-party cookies? Apple and Mozilla both killed off the user-tracking technology in 2020 . Google, the world's largest advertising company, originally said it wouldn't kill third-party cookies until 2022 . Then in 2021, it delayed the change until 2023. In 2022, it delayed everything again, until 2024 . It's 2024 now, and guess what? Another delay. Now Google says it won't turn off third-party cookies until 2025, five years after the competition.

    A new blog post cites UK regulations as the reason for the delay, saying, "We recognize that there are ongoing challenges related to reconciling divergent feedback from the industry, regulators and developers, and will continue to engage closely with the entire ecosystem." The post comes as part of the quarterly reports the company is producing with the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

    Interestingly, the UK’s CMA isn't concerned about user privacy but instead is worried about other web advertisers that compete with Google. The UK wants to make sure that Google isn't making changes to Chrome to prop up its advertising business at the expense of competitors. While other browser vendors shut down third-party cookies without a second thought, Google said it wouldn't turn off the user-tracking feature until it built an alternative advertising feature directly into Chrome, so it can track user interests to serve them relevant ads. The new advertising system, called the Topics API and "Privacy Sandbox," launched in Chrome in 2023. Google AdSense is already compatible .

    Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Google Pixel 8a : une vidéo de prise en main fuite avant son lancement

      news.movim.eu / JournalDuGeek · Yesterday - 08:43

    Google Pixel 8a Prise Main

    Le Google Pixel 8a n'a décidément plus aucun secret et apparaît désormais dans une vidéo de prise en main. Avec ces images, on sait à quoi ressemble le prochain smartphone abordable de Google.
    • chevron_right

      L’anéantissement des cookies tiers sur Chrome aura finalement lieu plus tard

      news.movim.eu / Numerama · Yesterday - 08:37

    elmo fire meme muppet

    Le plan de Google pour retirer les cookies tiers de son navigateur Chrome peine à se concrétiser. Présenté en 2020, il est en train de glisser en 2025.

    • Sl chevron_right

      Contact publication

      pubsub.blastersklan.com / slashdot · 2 days ago - 14:43 edit · 1 minute

    Google has fired another 20 workers for participating in protests against its $1.2 billion cloud computing contract with the Israeli government, according to an activist group representing the workers. From a report: In total, the company has now fired around 50 employees over sit-in protests held in Google offices last week that were part of yearslong discontent among a group of Google and Amazon workers over claims that Israel is using the companies' services to harm Palestinians. Google has denied those claims, saying Project Nimbus, the cloud-computing contract, doesn't involve "highly sensitive, classified, or military workloads relevant to weapons or intelligence services," and that Israeli government ministries that use its commercial cloud must agree to its terms of services and other policies. No Tech For Apartheid, the group representing the workers, claimed in a statement that Google is attempting to "quash dissent, silence its workers, and reassert its power over them." "That's because Google values its profit, and its $1.2 billion contract with the Israeli government and military, more than people. And it certainly values it over its own workers," it said. The group said it will continue organizing until Google cancels Project Nimbus. Further reading: Google To Employees: 'We Are a Workplace'.

    Read more of this story at Slashdot.

    Google Fires More Employees Over Protest of Cloud Contract With Israel
    • wifi_tethering open_in_new

      This post is public

      tech.slashdot.org /story/24/04/23/148207/google-fires-more-employees-over-protest-of-cloud-contract-with-israel

    • chevron_right

      First real-life Pixel 9 Pro pictures leak, and it has 16GB of RAM

      news.movim.eu / ArsTechnica · 3 days ago - 17:43 · 1 minute

    OnLeak's renders of the <a href='https://www.mysmartprice.com/gear/pixel-9-pro-5k-renders-360-degree-video-exclusive/'>Pixel 9 Pro XL</a>, the <a href='https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/google-pixel-9-design-render-exclusive/'>Pixel 9 Pro</a>, and the <a href = 'https://www.91mobiles.com/hub/google-pixel-9-renders-design-exclusive/'>Pixel 9.</a>

    Enlarge / OnLeak's renders of the Pixel 9 Pro XL , the Pixel 9 Pro , and the Pixel 9. (credit: OnLeaks / 91Mobiles / MySmartPrice)

    The usual timeline would put the Google Pixel 9 at something like five months away from launching, but that doesn't mean it's too early to leak! Real-life pictures of the "Pixel 9 Pro" model have landed over at Rozetked .

    This prototype looks just like the renders from OnLeaks that first came out back in January. The biggest change is a new pill-shaped camera bump instead of the edge-to-edge design of old models. It looks rather stylish in real-life photos, with the rounded corners of the pill and camera glass matching the body shape. The matte back looks like it still uses the excellent "soft-touch glass" material from last year. The front and back of the phone are totally flat, with a metal band around the side. The top edge still has a signal window cut out of it, which is usually for mmWave. The Pixel 8 Pro's near-useless temperature sensor appears to still be on the back of this prototype. At least, the spot for the temperature sensor—the silver disk right below the LED camera flash—looks identical to the Pixel 8 Pro. As a prototype any of this could change before the final release, but this is what it looks like right now.

    The phone was helpfully photographed next to an iPhone 14 Pro Max, and you might notice that the Pixel 9 Pro looks a little small! That's because this is one of the small models, with only a 6.1-inch display. Previously for Pixels, "Pro" meant "the big model," but this year Google is supposedly shipping three models, adding in a top-tier small phone. There's the usual big Pixel 9, with a 6.7-inch display, which will reportedly be called the "Pixel 9 Pro XL." The new model is the "Pixel 9 Pro"—no XL—which is a small model but still with all the "Pro" trimmings, like three rear cameras. There's also the Pixel 9 base model, which is the usual smaller phone (6.03-inch) with cut-down specs like only two rear cameras.

    Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

    • chevron_right

      Google Pixel 9 Pro : ces drôles d’images confirment un changement de design

      news.movim.eu / JournalDuGeek · 3 days ago - 14:48

    Google Pixel 9 Pro Reel

    De nouvelles images montrent le Pixel 9 Pro, le prochain smartphone de Google, à côté d'un iPhone 14 Pro Max. La firme lancerait trois Pixel 9 cette année.
    • chevron_right

      Quel est ce Jour de la Terre célébré dans le Doodle du 22 avril 2024 ?

      news.movim.eu / Numerama · 3 days ago - 09:41

    Le moteur de recherche Google change de logo ce lundi 22 avril 2024. Pour célébrer la Journée de la Terre, chaque lettre est dessinée par un paysage porteur d'espoir pour la biodiversité.

    • chevron_right

      LaLiga Targets Apple &#038; Google Bosses For Failing to &#8216;Remote Delete&#8217; IPTV App

      news.movim.eu / TorrentFreak · 3 days ago - 09:38 · 5 minutes

    LaLiga-new Spain found itself at the center of a worldwide controversy last month when it was revealed that various rightsholders had somehow managed to convince a local judge to block Telegram in its entirety .

    Under intense pressure, the judge quickly rolled back the decision after an advisor concluded that the planned measure was massively disproportionate. Just weeks later, a row over an app that’s no longer available from any official app store, seems to be heading towards another controversy and yet more debate on what constitutes a proportionate response to online piracy.

    This time top-tier football league LaLiga stands front and center.

    Newplay: Popular .M3U Player Unpopular With LaLiga

    For an explanation of the capabilities of the Newplay app, here’s what LaLiga itself told the European Commission in a 2022 submission to its Counterfeiting and Piracy Watch List ( pdf, translated )

    The ‘Newplay IPTV’ player application, developed by ITECH SLU, is one of the main player apps focused on Spain. In 2021, more than 900,000 users downloaded the app through Google Play, in Spain alone. This application has its own website (www.newplay.site) and has various profiles on social networks and communication channels: Telegram (+17k members); Twitch (+2,000 followers); Instagram (+29.2k followers); YouTube (23k subscribers). Through these, the use of the app is promoted. As can be seen in the attached evidence, through this application users can access various audiovisual content such as sports, TV channels, series, movies, etc.

    That the description above offered plenty of facts and figures for everything except the alleged infringement, which only gets a line of attention right at the end, isn’t exactly typical of these kinds of submissions. The evidence amounted to a screenshot of a video of the app on YouTube, showing icons for various TV channels, two of which appeared to relate to LaLiga.

    Crucially, there were no claims that the app arrives in the hands of users already configured to supply LaLiga match streams, nor was there any mention that the app requires users to supply their own M3U playlists. However, there was a screenshot of a comment made by a user querying an in-app message (“It asks me to enter a URL, what do I have to do?”) and two responses.

    One response appeared to be from someone affiliated with Newplay, who wrote: “You have to add or create a channel list.” The other response linked to a URL where a playlist could be obtained. If that playlist had been posted by someone working for Newplay, that could’ve caused problems. There are no signs that was the case though; in isolation it only adds weight to the claim that no channels were provided in the app.

    LaLiga Takes Complaint to Court

    In the same month as the submission, April 2022, LaLiga walked away from a Spanish court (Juzgado de. Instrucción Nº 1 de Cieza) with an order that targeted Newplay.

    The order is referenced multiple times on the LaLiga website but no copy has been posted for public consumption and, thus far, we’ve had no luck locating a copy. The big question is whether the order was handed down after an adversarial procedure or one that relied purely on evidence supplied by LaLiga.

    What does seem clear, however, is that the order required various intermediaries to take action to undermine Newplay’s ability to remain functional. Whether the companies took action before or after the order was handed down isn’t clear but Google, Apple, and Huawei acted similarly by removing Newplay from their app stores.

    But for LaLiga’s top man, that wasn’t enough. Last September, Javier Tebas revealed that LaLiga had “eliminated” 58 pirate apps, by unspecified means, together worth a million downloads in Spain. He said that having “eliminated” the apps, LaLiga wanted Google to ‘locate’ apps already downloaded onto users phones, so they too could be “eliminated”. If the same can be done for child abuse images, then the same should apply to piracy tools, Tebas said.

    There was no official response from Google, but it’s not difficult to see why the prospect of digging into users’ phones, to remotely delete content, could be problematic. The privacy implications alone could cause huge headaches, as LaLiga is well aware; a 250,000 euro fine for turning fans phones into piracy spying devices should’ve been an instant reminder, logically at least.

    Instead, LaLiga is doubling down

    According to an eLDiario.es report, LaLiga has now asked the investigating judge in the Newplay case to charge the local directors of Google, Apple, and Huawei, with “a crime of serious disobedience.” This relates to their alleged failures to prevent users of their app ecosystems from continuing to use downloaded copies of Newplay that still exist on their devices.

    It’s a crime that carries a sentence of up to a year in prison.

    In these preliminary proceedings, Google, Apple, and Huawei as corporate entities also stand accused of the same “crime of serious disobedience.” They also stand accused of cooperating with Newplay’s developer while profiting from his allegedly infringing, ad-supported activities.

    “The person under investigation used his ‘simple’ video player as a necessary instrument for his clients to access the Television services he offered in exchange for a subscription or advertising, violating the rights of the content owners,” LaLiga informed the court, as recalled by elDiario.es .

    In addition to removing the app from their stores, the order required Google, Apple, and Huawei to “prevent users” who had downloaded app from “accessing the application.” It further ordered them to “immediately cease payment of commissions” derived from Newplay’s paid version (without ads) and make available to the court “the amounts that may be pending delivery” to the Newplay developer.

    According to LaLiga, the companies haven’t complied in either respect. All three refused to comment for legal reasons.

    As reported this weekend, the app Smart IPTV was blocked by ISPs in Spain recently . In common with Newplay, Smart IPTV is also an .M3U player and comes with no infringing content or links.

    From: TF , for the latest news on copyright battles, piracy and more.

    • chevron_right

      Très utilisé, ce service Google pourrait rapidement disparaitre !

      news.movim.eu / JournalDuGeek · 3 days ago - 07:33

    Google

    Google prépare le déplacement des rappels de Google Keep vers Google Tasks. Ce changement intervient après des migrations similaires depuis Google Assistant et Google Calendar, confirmant la volonté du moteur de recherche de centraliser les fonctionnalités de rappel. Quitte à abandonner Google Keep à son triste sort.